A timeline how the Capitol attack unfolded on January 6, 2021
Here’s what took place on January 6, 2021, as insurrectionists stormed the U.S. Capitol.
President Donald Trump’s nomination of a lawyer who has valorized Jan. 6 Capitol attackers to be the top federal prosecutor in the nation’s capital has hit a roadblock due to rare opposition from a Republican senator.
Trump appointed Ed Martin as interim U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C. on Jan. 20, and Martin has been reshaping the powerful D.C. prosecutorial office since then: The staunch Trump ally has fired many prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6-related cases and launched probes into prominent Democrats.
On Monday, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) failed to list Martin’s nomination on the committee’s agenda for its upcoming meeting May 8. The omission came as Republican support for Martin appeared to wobble. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), a committee member, said Tuesday that he decided not to support the nomination due to Martin’s positions on Jan. 6-related defendants.
“If Mr. Martin were being put forth as a US attorney for any district except the district where January 6th happened, the protest happened, I’d probably support him, but not in this district,” Tillis told reporters Tuesday.
Given committee rules that allow any member to delay procedures one week, Martin’s absence from the committee’s agenda means the nomination is unlikely to be able to move out of committee for a full Senate vote by May 20, when Martin’s interim role expires.
A spokesperson for Grassley didn’t immediately respond to USA TODAY’s request for comment, including on whether Martin was missing from the agenda because he lacks sufficient Republican support.
Martin has also drawn criticism for his frequent appearances on Russian TV, which he initially omitted from disclosures to the judiciary committee, and for quickly launching probes into prominent Democrats since becoming beginning his interim role.
Tillis said Tuesday the White House could still pursue avenues for confirming Martin, but that he told White House officials he won’t support the nomination.
Following Tillis’ comments Tuesday, the White House indicated it was sticking by Martin.
“Ed Martin is a fantastic U.S. Attorney for D.C. and will continue to implement the President’s law-and-order agenda in Washington. He is the right man for the job and we look forward to his confirmation,” White House Principal Deputy Communications Director Alex Pfeiffer told USA TODAY in a statement.
Here’s a look at why Martin’s nomination has stewed growing controversy:
Championing Jan. 6 defendants
On Jan. 6, 2021, Martin indicated on social media that he was outside the Capitol supporting the efforts to block Congress and then-Vice President Mike Pence from counting the presidential electoral votes to certify Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory.
“Like Mardi Gras in DC today: love, faith and joy. Ignore #FakeNews,” Martin said in a 2:57 p.m post on then-Twitter, that included a photo from the Capitol grounds. That was about an hour after rioters had begun to breach the Capitol.
In the years since, Martin has continued to champion Jan. 6 rioters, and represented several defendants in Jan. 6-related cases.
“Oath Keepers are all of us,” Martin posted months later on June 8, 2021, referring to a far-right militia group whose leaders were convicted of seditious conspiracy and other Jan. 6-related crimes.
After Trump granted clemency to the more than 1,500 Jan. 6-related criminal defendants and appointed Martin as interim D.C. U.S. attorney, Martin fired dozens of prosecutors in the office who handled those cases.
“He seems to be more of a Trump attack dog fulfilling a retribution agenda than a serious candidate for US attorney — a role where good judgment, a commitment to fairness, and public confidence are essential attributes,” wrote former U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan Barbara McQuade in an email.
Politicizing prosecutorial office?
The U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C. has authority to investigate and prosecute crimes within that area, including within the federal government, creating a special risk of political mischief.
Since assuming office, Martin has sent letters to several prominent Democrats demanding information as part of a probe. Rep. Eugene Vindman (D-Virginia), Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-New York), and Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) have all received such letters, according to the Washington Post.
The letter to Schumer, for instance, suggested Schumer had threatened public officials when he said in 2020 that Supreme Court justices would “pay the price” for releasing “the whirlwind” as they considered an abortion case. The next day, Schumer expressed regret for his words on the Senate floor, and a Schumer aide told Martin the comments weren’t a physical threat.
Martin also raised eyebrows after his office said he and other U.S. attorneys are lawyers for Trump himself.
“As President Trumps’ (sic) lawyers, we are proud to fight to protect his leadership,” his office posted on X Feb. 25.
The comment spurred concerns from rule-of-law-focused organizations.
“The U.S. attorneys represent the United States of America and not the president, and he should know that a statement like that, it’s just a crystal clear declaration – a confession, really – that he’s not fit for this role,” said Gregg Nunziata, a former Chief Nominations Counsel to Senate Judiciary Committee Republicans.
Nunziata now heads the Society for the Rule of Law, a group of predominantly conservative lawyers focused on rule-of-law issues.
Russian TV appearances
Martin, who is now heading an office that takes on national security cases in the nation’s capital, also appeared more than 150 times on TV networks that are funded and directed by the Russian government from 2016 and 2024, according to a Washington Post analysis.
Martin didn’t initially disclose those appearances on a Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire that asks nominees to list their media interviews, although an aide in his office later said he had disclosed “all of the identified links” in a supplemental letter.
In one appearance just nine days before Russia invaded Ukraine in February of 2022, Martin said on Russian state television network RT that there was no evidence of a Russian military buildup at Ukraine’s borders.
In an appearance on Sputnik the following month, Martin urged a stronger U.S. alliance with Russia.
“What Trump knew was you want to be allies with the toughest dudes on the street. And he was ready to be allies with North Korea and with Putin and everybody,” Martin said, according to the Washington Post.
The Justice Department, which includes Martin’s U.S. attorney office, referred USA TODAY to the White House when asked for comment, including on whether Martin was paid for the appearances.Contributing: Bart Jansen and Riley Beggin – USA TODAY